Saturday July 18, 2026 | EN FR AR Live
Delayed Ebola Response Threatens Billions in Costs for DR Congo and Uganda, Think Tank Warns
Africa

Delayed Ebola Response Threatens Billions in Costs for DR Congo and Uganda, Think Tank Warns

Delayed Ebola Response Threatens Billions in Costs for DR Congo and Uganda, Think Tank Warns
Photo by Helena Jankovičová Kováčová on Pexels

A leading African security think tank has warned that the slow international response to an ongoing Ebola outbreak in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo risks spiralling into a regional crisis, with potential economic losses for DR Congo and Uganda already projected in the billions of dollars.

The Institute for Security Studies (ISS) said in a recent analysis that more than US$700 million in additional health financing is needed to rapidly contain the virus and prevent cross-border transmission. According to ISS, every week of delay expands the scope of the emergency and increases the burden on health systems, trade routes and humanitarian operations in both countries.

A fragile cross-border frontier

Eastern DR Congo has long struggled to contain recurring Ebola outbreaks, complicated by armed conflict, population displacement and porous borders with neighbouring states. Uganda, which shares a lengthy frontier with DR Congo, has previously recorded imported cases and continues to conduct surveillance along high-risk corridors. The two governments have run joint vaccination and contact-tracing campaigns in past epidemics, but resources have often lagged behind the scale of the threat.

ISS researchers argue that the economic cost of inaction extends well beyond the health sector. Disrupted trade, reduced agricultural production, declining investor confidence and the diversion of national budgets toward emergency response can each impose heavy long-term costs on economies already under pressure.

Financing gap and global attention

The ISS estimate places the additional financing requirement at over US$700 million, covering surveillance, laboratory capacity, vaccination drives, treatment centres and community engagement. The think tank noted that donor fatigue and competing global crises have made it harder to mobilise funds quickly, even as outbreaks of viral haemorrhagic fever demand immediate, well-coordinated responses.

International health agencies, including the World Health Organization and Médecins Sans Frontières, have repeatedly stressed that early investment is far cheaper than late-stage emergency containment. Past outbreaks in West Africa demonstrated how delays in funding and deployment can transform a localised health emergency into a multi-country crisis with global implications.

Toward a regional containment strategy

ISS is calling for a coordinated regional approach that brings together the Congolese and Ugandan governments, regional bodies such as the East African Community, and international donors. Strengthening cross-border disease surveillance, supporting frontline health workers and ensuring predictable financing are central to that strategy, the institute said.

Without a swift increase in funding, analysts warn, the human and economic toll of the outbreak will continue to mount, deepening the vulnerability of communities already affected by conflict and displacement. The message from ISS is consistent with lessons drawn from previous outbreaks: in pandemic response, the cost of delay is invariably higher than the cost of preparation.

Source: AllAfrica — read the original report.

Share

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *