Thursday August 27, 2026 | EN FR AR Live
Students walking between lecture buildings on a Kenyan university campus during the day, with tropical trees and modern concrete structures
Kenya

Kenya’s shift from scholarships to loans reignites higher education funding debate

Students walking between lecture buildings on a Kenyan university campus during the day, with tropical trees and modern concrete structures
EstherWikipedian / CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Kenya’s long-running conversation over how to finance university education has resurfaced, as commentators weigh whether the country’s gradual shift away from scholarships towards a loan-based model serves the interests of students and the wider economy. According to peopledaily.digital, the policy direction continues to draw sharp reactions from educators, parents, and policymakers.

For decades, Kenya supported university students through a combination of government scholarships and the Higher Education Loans Board (HELB), which provided repayable loans to undergraduates. Critics have long argued that the old scholarship system was fiscally unsustainable, while supporters counter that loans, however concessional, place a heavy burden on graduates struggling to find formal employment.

The debate comes against the backdrop of a young, fast-growing population for whom higher education is widely viewed as a pathway out of poverty. Kenya’s public universities have historically been a powerful symbol of social mobility, admitting students from across the country’s diverse counties and ethnic communities. Any change to the funding architecture therefore carries political as well as economic weight, and ministers have been careful to stress that disadvantaged students will continue to receive support.

Proponents of the loan-based approach say it expands the pool of students who can access higher education while sharing costs between the state and graduates. Opponents, including student leaders, warn that rising household debt and limited job opportunities could leave many borrowers unable to repay, undermining the very goal the reforms seek to achieve.

With the new academic year approaching, the discussion is likely to intensify as universities, the Universities Fund, and HELB prepare for another cohort of applicants, and as civil society groups call for greater transparency on how loans are disbursed, recovered, and ultimately reinvested in the sector.

Sources

This report was written from coverage published by the following news organisations. Follow the links for the original reporting.

Share

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *