A proposed law that would label individuals and organisations receiving foreign funding as foreign agents is generating fierce controversy in Uganda, with civil society groups, rights activists, and sections of the business community warning it could stifle dissent, damage the economy, and undermine fundamental freedoms.
The Protection of Sovereignty Bill would criminalise actions deemed to promote the interests of a foreigner against the interests of Uganda. Critics say the legislation, which proposes sentences of up to 20 years in prison for certain violations, mirrors similar laws in Russia and China used to silence opposition voices and curb civil society activity.
A Gag Law Cloaked in Patriotism
At a press conference, former cabinet minister Miria Matembe led the criticism. I have never seen such a controversial, widely rejected bill being rushed to be debated within two days, she said. Human rights organisation Article 19 called on Uganda to withdraw the bill entirely, warning that vague definitions made it dangerously broad and open to abuse. Human Rights Watch noted the bills language would allow authorities to accuse anyone receiving foreign funding without written approval of acting as a foreign agent.
Dividing Opinion
Businessman Elijah Rabwoni supported the bill. The law is controversial, is good. It has come at a time whereby many people are receiving money without being monitored well. Motorcycle taxi driver Samuel Musoba warned of economic fallout. If the money is not coming in the country, the business will not move as well. So it will affect me as a person, and at the end of the day, also my family.
International Concerns Echo at Home
The Committee to Protect Journalists warned the bills provisions could affect media organisations reliant on foreign grants. The Forum for Democratic Change linked the bill to a pattern of repressive legislation targeting civil society. Activists are preparing legal challenges as debate continues over one of the most contested pieces of Ugandan legislation in years.